Vahid Online in English

Automated AI translations of Vahid Online reporting. Exported from the Telegram Channel. Original content also available on X/Twitter.

← Back to latest feed

10 Jun 2026, 03:42

The video that Trump posted: If you kill one American, we won't respond with a proportional answer; we will respond with complete disaster.
realDonaldTrump
ChatGPT:
Trump shared a scene from the famous political series The West Wing; a scene that has a very clear meaning for the American audience.

This scene is from the episode "A Proportional Response." In the storyline of the series, an American plane on a medical mission is targeted, and several Americans, including the President's personal physician, are killed. In the White House Situation Room, military commanders present options for a limited and "proportional" attack; however, the fictional President, Jed Bartlet, angrily asks what the point of such a response is. He argues that if the enemy knows that America always responds in a limited and predictable manner, then this response is no longer deterrent.

The significance of choosing this scene lies in the fact that Trump, after an attack that has been officially described as "proportional," sends a dual message: on one hand, he states that the current response is controlled and limited; on the other hand, he warns that the limitation of this response should not be interpreted as weakness. The end of the scene comes with a clear threat: if an American is killed, the next response could go beyond the "proportional" framework and turn into "complete disaster."

However, there is an important point in the series itself: Bartlet is ultimately restrained from an disproportionate reaction by his advisors and settles for a limited response. Therefore, by sharing this part, Trump emphasizes more the angry and deterrent aspect of the message rather than conveying the entire message of the series; a message for Tehran, and simultaneously for the domestic audience in America: "For now, we have limited our response, but the bigger option is still on the table."

Garak:
This scene is from the television series "The West Wing."

Specifically, it is from Season 1, Episode 3 titled "A Proportional Response."

What is the context of the story?

This scene is a direct continuation of the previous episode (Episode 2 of Season 1 titled "Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc"). In the previous episode, an American plane carrying the personal friend of President Josiah Bartlet (played by Martin Sheen) is shot down by Syrian forces, resulting in the deaths of several Americans (including the President's friend).

President Bartlet, who is usually calm, intelligent, and ethical, is this time very angry and seeking personal revenge. He is in the White House Situation Room with Admiral Fitzwallace and his military advisors.

What is the meaning and significance of the conversation?

The military presents an option called "Proportional Response." This means:

  • Syria (or its supported forces) shot down a plane → we will hit a few limited military targets like an ammunition depot, a railway bridge, and their intelligence building.
  • This action seems "fair" and "proportional" to the damage inflicted and prevents escalation.

President Bartlet, however, does not accept this logic and angrily asks:

"What is the virtue of a proportional response? Why is it good?
They shot down a plane, we hit a transmitter? Is that a proportional response?"

He argues that:

  • The enemy knows exactly what we are doing (because we have always done this).
  • Therefore, they will evacuate the targets in advance (like those depots and bridges that have been empty for three days).
  • The result? Our response becomes ineffective, and the enemy becomes bolder.

Bartlet wants to give a "Disproportional Response":

"If you kill one American, any American, we won't respond with a proportional answer.
We will respond with complete disaster."

This means delivering a blow so heavy and surprising that the enemy will be terrified forever and will not dare to attack again.

What ultimately happens?

When the military suggests a more severe option (bombing an airport that would result in thousands of civilian casualties), Bartlet retreats and chooses the initial proportional response. This reflects his inner conflict:

  • On one hand, anger and personal emotions (because his friend has been killed).
  • On the other hand, the responsibility of the presidency and fear of killing innocents and starting a larger war.

Why is this scene so famous and important?

  • It was written by Aaron Sorkin (the genius writer of the series), and its dialogues are very strong and philosophical.
  • It represents one of the main themes of the series: the conflict between idealism and realism in power.
  • Martin Sheen delivers an outstanding performance in this scene, beautifully portraying Bartlet's anger, despair, and ultimately maturity.
  • Many see this scene as a symbol of American foreign policy: should we always respond "proportionally," or sometimes act decisively and deterrently?
    📡 @VahidOnline

Attached media

#76132 · video/mp4 · 2.3 MB

Mapped locations (2)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors