Vahid Online in English

Automated AI translations of Vahid Online reporting. Exported from the Telegram Channel. Original content also available on X/Twitter.

← Back to latest feed

22 Oct 2026, 00:23

The New York Times reported that the U.S. and Israeli militaries have prepared plans for new attacks on Iran following the U.S. midterm elections. However, Donald Trump's final decision remains unclear, and there are doubts about the effectiveness of these attacks.

In its report dated October 21, the newspaper cited U.S. officials and individuals familiar with the discussions, stating that planning is underway for short but intense operations, with both militaries practicing attack maneuvers through increased exercises and flights over Iraq.

According to U.S. officials, U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin also discussed new attacks with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during his visit to Israel this week. Sources in the report requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of military planning.

▪️ Potential Goal: Pressure for Concessions
According to the report, Iran's energy infrastructure, nuclear facilities, and missile and drone arsenal are potential targets for operations. However, some officials have stated that refineries and oil infrastructure will not be targeted to prevent further increases in gasoline prices.

Some American planners believe that a three-day intense operation could cause enough economic damage to change Tehran's position and compel it to make diplomatic concessions.

This assessment faces skepticism. The New York Times noted that previous attacks, from March to May, led to increased energy prices and global inflation, reduced regional security, and severe pressure on U.S. interceptor missile stocks, yet the Iranian government endured the economic pressures.

Dana Stroul, a former Pentagon official for Middle Eastern affairs, stated that neither Trump nor Netanyahu has provided a convincing explanation of how further war could change the existing strategic stalemate.

▪️ Trump Previously Delayed an Attack at the Last Minute
According to the New York Times, Trump has opposed returning to major combat operations several times this year. Earlier this month, after extensive preparations by the U.S. and Israeli militaries and their air forces being placed on the highest alert, he decided to delay the attack just before operations were set to begin.

U.S. officials have indicated that the likelihood of operations starting this month is low, and political considerations, including Trump's promise not to attack before voting, make waiting until after the U.S. midterm elections more probable.

According to the report, the full deployment of U.S. desired forces and equipment, including three aircraft carriers, thousands of Marines, fighter jets, and special operations forces, will be completed by early November.

A White House official declined to comment on the existence or absence of these plans, stating that Trump has kept all options on the table to prevent the Iranian government from acquiring nuclear weapons.

Israeli elections will also influence decision-making. The elections on October 27 could complicate the implementation of plans. Experts told the New York Times that if Netanyahu fails and continues in a caretaker prime minister role, starting a war would be more difficult for him.

Some analysts have speculated that Netanyahu might use the prospect of a joint attack with the U.S. to encourage his rivals to form a unity or emergency government, a move that could extend his time in power.
...
@VahidOOnLine
📡 @VahidOnline

Mapped locations (2)

Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors